Disk Defragmenter Is Bringing Me Down.
I was just thinking, hey maybe a visualization of data on a hard disk would be nice after learning of a bit of a RAID issue that may have occurred with someone’s disks. So then I wondered what these different disk patterns would look like, different configurations of RAID, different volume formats, drobo likely has some crazy pattern. Though when I pictured them, all I could think of was Disk Defragmenter.
And as I installed Vista on the new desktop, I thought I would get Mr. Defrag up and running. Which is when I found this:
Vista Defragmenter seems to have taken all the fun (and intelligence, and usefulness) out of XP Defragmenter. Not only have they taken away the ability to see actual block use on the disk in a visual way, they have also taken away any sort of user control, including the ability to specify which drives it defrags (it seems to do them all).
Worst of all they even dumbed down the progress meter, which is now (as shown) a spinning circle, and a comment saying “This may take from a few minutes to a few hours.” No sense of progress is shown at all, which is weird because Windows loves progress bars that are horribly inaccurate (the installation progress bar for XP strikes me as the best example of awful) and Disk Defragmenter is a place they can acheive perfect accuracy, at least with percentage complete (if not time), and they give the user … nothing. How Microsoft.
comments
Comments closed for this article.

reverb
Apr 15, 01:21 pm #
My thoughts exactly. I have now switched to one of the popular realtime auto defraggers, and for the job its doing i’d say its a small price to pay. Extremely efficient, great interface and smooth hassle free defrags. If it can save time and the tension of defragmenting manually, i’d say why not.